In This Issue
   
 

Editor's Note

 

MyPyramid, Inc.

 

Fun with MyPyramid

 

Food Giants on
the Run

 

Call for Papers

 

Seeking Local Stories

 
Quote, Unquote
   
  “USDA seems to have bent over backward to avoid upsetting any particular commodity group or food company by not showing any foods that Americans should eat less of.”
   – Margo Wootan, Center for Science in the Public Interest, on the new food pyramid.
   
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
   
 

Email this page to a friend or coworker
 

   
  Follow this link to subscribe to this newsletter.
   
  To unsubscribe, just hit reply and ask to be removed.
   
  We have a strict privacy policy and do not share your personal information with anyone except in the newsletter mailing process.
 
 

 
   

May 2005

Editor's Note: Sorry loyal readers, but April got away from us. The good news is that we’re back with a special May issue of Informed Eating dedicated to tearing apart the pathetic revised food pyramid. For a whopping cost to the American taxpayer of $2.5 million, all we got was a lousy rainbow and some stairs. Is it just me, or is that silly stick figure climbing towards the unhealthy foods at the top? Read on for more well-deserved stinging critique.

IN MY OPINION, by Michele Simon

MyPyramid, Inc.: Nutrition Guide Hijacked by Big Food
Originally published on Ascribe Newswire, 4/25/05

Last week, the federal government revealed its much-anticipated revision of the "Food Guide Pyramid" -- that peculiar icon of nutrition advice that adorns cereal boxes and not much else. By the U.S. Department of Agriculture's own estimates, while most people (80 percent surveyed) recognize the triangular graphic, a sobering two to four percent actually follow its principles. To try and fix this problem, Uncle Sam set out to create a new and improved version. In true government fashion, the job was outsourced to the mega-PR firm, Porter Novelli International. While past clients have included the likes of McDonald’s and the Snack Food Association, the company promised there would be no conflict of interest.

So what did U.S. taxpayers get for its $2.5 million? Reactions from nutrition experts to the new graphic that contains no actual information -- just colored sections and a figure walking up stairs -- have been swift and unequivocal: The new "MyPyramid" is certainly no better and may even be worse than the old version. With all of the dietary details now only available via the web site, buried deep among too many pages to click through, who on earth is going to bother to take the time?

Exercise and Eat All You Want

At the government's press conference, taking center stage was fitness guru Denise Austin, introduced by USDA Secretary Mike Johanns as a wife and a mother. (Are we still in the 1950s?) Overflowing with energy, Austin implored reporters to join her in a stretching routine. That the federal government's idea of unveiling a $2.5 million dietary educational tool was reduced to a Jane Fonda video was embarrassing to say the least. But more insidiously, Uncle Sam's emphasis on physical activity plays right into the hands of the food industry.

In recent months, food companies have come under increasing attack for contributing to public health problems. The main way that industry deflects blame for incessantly promoting unhealthy products is to point to the nation's couch-potato tendencies. The government has now officially adopted the food industry's argument that exercise is the real answer to the nation's health woes. Of course exercise is important, but so are other healthy behaviors, such as getting enough sleep. If one side of the pyramid shows someone walking up stairs to emphasize the importance of exercise, why doesn't the other side show someone lying down to emphasize the importance of rest? Simply because sleep doesn't carry the same message of personal responsibility (industry's mantra) that exercise does.

Let the Co-opting Begin

We need no better sign that the new pyramid is a victory for industry than all the ways that major companies are wasting no time applauding it. For example, on the same day as the government press conference, in what must have been accomplished by Photoshop trickery, cereal boxes depicted on General Mills' website already contained the new image. "We want to help communicate these important messages by using some of the best real estate there is," said John Haugen, of General Mills. "The cereal box is one of the most read items in the home. With cereal consumed in 93 percent of American households, this is a powerful step forward in nutrition education," he said. How comforting to know that Americans read cereal boxes for their nutrition advice. But the new graphic doesn't contain any actual information. "Reading" the food pyramid while downing a bowl of Lucky Charms isn't exactly what most nutritionists would call either sound education or a recommended dietary practice.

Snack food and beverage giant PepsiCo also jumped on the bandwagon with an ad touting the new graphic in USA Today, just two days after the government release. In its statement, the company said the food guidelines highlight energy balance as a key concept in maintaining health. "Energy balance" is the food industry's subtle way of promoting their over-simplified calories-in / calories-out message. This conveniently sidesteps any education regarding the actual nutritional content of the calories, since that could result in people avoiding the food giant's unhealthy products.

Also last week, a press release from the Grocery Manufacturers of America (the packaged food industry's powerful lobbying organization) proudly announced its plans to promote the new pyramid to students, teachers, and families. The trade group also took credit for the old icon’s 80 percent recognition rate, saying it is "due, in part, to the efforts of the food and beverage industry." Seems they weren't so interested in taking credit for how 96-98 percent of people don't follow it.

The very name MyPyramid tells us the government is squarely placing all responsibility for eating right with you and me. Never mind those pesky government subsidies and tax breaks to big agribusiness and food manufacturers that make unhealthy food so cheap and ubiquitous. Thank goodness Uncle Sam has created a web site to counter all that. Now that the pyramid has been completely hijacked by the food industry and promises to be as useless an educational tool as it ever was, it's time to hang up the effort altogether. Just think of all the money government could save in addition to $2.5 million if it really wanted to improve America's eating habits: no more paying for expensive PR firms, corporate welfare, high health-care costs, or fitness bimbos.


Fun with MyPyramid

AMA Says 185% of Americans Now Overweight

Here’s the good news: we know for sure that nutrition policy has finally made it onto the national stage. Even the Daily Show’s Jon Stewart took potshots at the ridiculous new graphic. All he had to do was describe it to get laughs. He reported how the old pyramid gave the public “a memorable icon to ignore while dipping their McRibs into their Shamrock Shakes.” You can view the entire hilarious piece here:

http://www.comedycentral.com/mp/play.jhtml?reposid=/multimedia/tds/headlines/10054.html


United States Department of Agribusiness

Apparently, Porter Novelli was unable to spare the extra 8 bucks out of its $2.5 million fee to purchase the mypyramid.org domain, so a couple of environmental activists in Minneapolis did instead and are having great fun with a mirror image site. Looks exactly the same, but the words are certainly not. For example, the site describes the goal of USDA’s Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (the division responsible for the pyramid) as to “advance and promote dietary guidance that supports the interests of agribusiness, with total disregard for the risks of chemical fertilizers, pesticides and genetic modification, while under-stating the dangers of meat and other animal food products to the health of our families and our planet.” Well said!

Here’s what site creators Stephen Eisenmenger and Molly Nutting told Informed Eating about their motivation: “We're hoping to use the site to represent the USDA more truthfully than they represent themselves, by talking openly and brazenly about the industry motives behind dietary guidelines, the total absence of any mention of where food comes from, and the social and environmental degradation that results from the industrialization and corporatization of our health.” Good luck!

Visit the parody web site here: www.MyPyramid.org.


Food Giants on the Run: Industry Rewrites Laws to Avoid Liability
Feature article for CorpWatch, by Michele Simon, 3/21/05

The food industry is working with politicians across the United States to rewrite laws in order to shield themselves from lawsuits based on obesity and related health problems.

Read the entire article here:

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11984


Call for Papers: Food Advertising to Children and the Law

CIFC’s Michele Simon has been asked to coordinate a symposium issue of the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review on the hot topic of food advertising aimed at children. Articles will focus on legal analysis of the problem to create a better understanding of the various options for regulation. Suggested topics include: federal regulation, first amendment, industry self-regulation, and litigation. Please send a brief letter of inquiry explaining your topic and experience in the field ASAP to Michele Simon at michele@informedeating.org. Articles will be due late summer/early fall; the live symposium will be in late October.


Seeking Local Stories of Battling Big Food

CIFC is currently gathering stories at the state and local levels where the food industry is attempting to block nutrition advocacy efforts. Many states, cities, and counties around the country are trying to pass nutrition-related legislation (e.g., limiting junk food in schools or imposing soda taxes), but the food industry is lobbying hard to either stop or curtail these efforts. If you know about any specific fights, we want to hear about them. We are especially interested in stories related to soda contracts in schools. Please contact Michele Simon at: Michele@informedeating.org or (510) 465-0322. Thank you!


The Center for Informed Food Choices in a nonprofit organization that advocates for a whole foods, plant-based diet and educates about the politics of food.

CIFC is proud to make Informed Eating available as a free public service. Unlike industry publications, it is not underwritten by corporate sponsors. We would greatly appreciate your support for this newsletter and our other important policy work. For more information or to make a tax-deductible donation, please visit www.informedeating.org or call (510) 465-0322.

Informed Eating is written and edited by Michele Simon. You may contact her at Michele@informedeating.org. Michele Simon is available for lectures and workshops in your community and can speak on a variety of food policy topics. For more information, visit: http://www.informedeating.org/lectures.html.

 


We encourage you to pass this newsletter along to friends.

2005 Informed Eating  -  All Rights Reserved